Floralozone
67634-15-5
4-ethyl-a,a-dimethylbenzene propanal; p-ethyl-a,a-dimethylhydrocinnamic aldehyde; a,a-dimethyl-p-ethylphenyl-propanal; 3-(p-ethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropionaldehyde; Florazone; 3-(4-ethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropanal
LYSMERAL
CAS No:80-54-6
CAS Name:Benzenepropanal, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-.alpha.-methyl-
Synonyms p-Tert. Butyl-alpha-methyldihydrocynnamic aldehyde / Lilestralis / Lilial / Lilialdehyde
A current process for producing an aromatic aldehyde compound is shown in Scheme I, wherein production of 4-tert-butyl-phenyl-formaldehyde is critical. The final step of the process requires hydrogen-reduction with palladium on carbon catalyst under high pressure. Use of noble metal as catalyst results in high cost of production. Patent NO. WO2007045641 owned by Badische Anilin- and Soda-Fabrik Corp. (BASF) aims at improving the final step for hydrogen-reduction of the above process. However, the reaction pressure is so high as 30 Bar, leading to difficulties in its industrialization.
Givaudin Corporation discloses a process for producing an aromatic aldehyde inBull. Soc. Chem. Fr., p 1194 in 1961, as shown in Scheme II. The process utilizes great amounts of TiCl4 and BF3-Et2O as catalyst. However, it has a yield less than 10%. Moreover, one of the raw materials, 2-methylpropenal, is rare and difficult to be obtained, and TiCl4 is easy to be hydrolyzed. Therefore, the process cannot be industrialized and will cause three wastes, that is, waste water, waste gas and industrial residue, leading to environmental pollutions.
DE2627112 discloses a process for producing an aromatic aldehyde compound as shown in Scheme III. Although its yield is higher than 80%, one of the raw materials, 2-methylpropenal, is extremely rare and high-priced, resulting in the limitation of the process in industrial application. A process published in Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 231(1-2), 61-66 (2005) is a modification of the above process and achieves a theoretical production rate of 95%. However, the modified process requires use of 4-tert-butyliodobenzene as raw material, rare elements as catalyst, and ion liquid for reaction, and has a reaction time more than 24 hours, which leads to its low efficiency and failure in industrial application.
DE2851024 discloses a process for producing an aromatic aldehyde compound, as shown in Scheme IV. The process requires a great amount of AlCl3, and has problems of three wastes and corrosion of manufacturing equipments. Furthermore, the known Vilsmeier reaction also has problems of three wastes and has a yield of only 35%. A process published in Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 14(1-2), p 2-20 is a modification of the above process. However, the modified process still requires hydrogen-reduction as a final step and utilizes noble metal as catalyst, contributing to its high production cost.
To overcome the shortcomings, the present invention provides a process for producing an aromatic aldehyde compound that requires no hydrogen-reduction under high pressure with expensive and complicated manufacturing equipments and will not cause pollution to environment to mitigate or obviate the aforementioned problems.
Example-1 Preparation of Compound 1
Compound 1 was obtained by Route 1 and experimental protocols as follows.
50 grams (0.37 mol) of tert-butylbenzene, 12.3 grams (0.40 mol) of paraformaldehyde and 100 mL of acetic acid were mixed in a flask. 109.6 grams of hydrogen bromide (HBr) in 33% (w/w) acetic acid solution was slowly added into the flask dropwise within 30 minutes and then heated to 120° C. and stirred for 7.5 hours. Samples were obtained and extracted with water and dichloromethane. Organic phase was obtained and subjected to thin-layer chromatography (TLC) for tracing reaction. Until reactants were consumed, 200 mL of water was added into the reaction mixture and then extracted with 200 mL dichloromethane for three times. Organic phases were collected, concentrated and distilled under a condition of a temperature of 165˜170° C. and a pressure of 4.8˜5.5×10−1 torr to obtain distilled fractions. 73.02 grams of compound 1 was obtained with a yield of 86.3%.
Example-2 Preparation of Phase Transfer Catalyst 1 (PTC 1)
Phase transfer catalyst 1 (PTC 1) was obtained by Route 2 and experimental protocols as follows.
10 grams (220.1 mmol) of compound 1 was dissolved in 200 mL of anhydrous ethanol, followed by adding 14.31 grams (242.1 mmol) of trimethylamine, refluxing for 2 hours and standing overnight. Precipitate was obtained by filtration and rinsed with anhydrous ethanol for three times to obtain a solid, which was dried and ready for use as PTC 1 in the following examples.
Example-3 Preparation of Compound 2
Compound 2 was obtained by Route 3 and experimental protocols as follows.
50 grams (0.47 mol) of ethylbenzene, 15.56 grams (0.52 mol) of paraformaldehyde and 100 mL acetic acid were mixed in a flask. 138.6 grams of hydrogen bromide in 33% (w/w) acetic acid solution was slowly added into the flask dropwise within 30 minutes and then heated to 120° C. and stirred for 7.5 hours. Samples were obtained and extracted with water and dichloromethane. Organic phase was obtained and subjected to TLC for tracing reaction. When the reaction was finished, 200 mL of water was added and extracted with 200 mL dichloromethane for three times. Organic phases were collected, concentrated and distilled under a condition of a temperature of 151˜156□ and a pressure of 4.2˜4.8×10−1 torr to obtain distilled fractions. 81.66 grams of compound 2 was obtained with a yield of 86.9%.
Example-4 Preparation of Phase Transfer Catalyst 2 (PTC 2)
Phase transfer catalyst 1 (PTC 2) was obtained by Route 4 and experimental protocols as follows.
10 grams (251.2 mmol) of compound 2 was dissolved in 200 mL of anhydrous ethanol, followed by adding 16.33 grams (276.3 mmol) of trimethylamine, refluxing for 2 hours and standing overnight. Precipitate was obtained by filtration and rinsed with anhydrous ethanol for three times to obtain a solid, which was dried and ready for use as PTC 2 in the following examples.
Comparative Example-1
The present example was performed by the following experimental protocols to produce lysmeral.
2.3 grams (57.7 mmol) of sodium hydroxide, 0.33 grams (0.88 mmol) of tetrabutylammonium iodide, 7.5 mL water, 4.2 mL toluene, 1 mL tetrahydrofuran (THF) were mixed in a flask and then heated to 70˜75° C. Mixture of 10 grams (44.0 mmol) of compound 1 and 3.55 grams (61.2 mmol) of propanal was slowly added into the flask dropwise within 2 hours while the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred. When addition was finished, the reaction mixture was stirred at 70-75° C. for 3 hours and traced by gas chromatography (GC). Until reactants were consumed, 30 mL water was added for extraction to obtain an organic phase. The organic phase was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated by vacuum distillation. 4.84 grams of lysmeral was obtained with a yield of 53.8%.
Example-5 Preparation of Lysmeral
The present invention was performed according to the following Route 5 and experimental protocols to obtain lysmeral.
2.3 grams (57.7 mmol) of sodium hydroxide, 0.26 grams (0.88 mmol) of PTC 1, 7.5 mL of water, 4.2 mL of toluene, 1 mL of THF were mixed in a flask and then heated to 70-75° C. Mixture of 10 grams (44.0 mmol) of compound 1 and 3.55 grams (61.2 mmol) of propanal was added into the flask dropwise within 2 hours while the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred. While addition was finished, the reaction mixture was stirred at 70-75° C. for 3 hours and traced by GC. When the reaction stopped, 30 mL water was added for extraction to obtain an organic phase. The organic phase was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated by vacuum distillation. 7.43 grams of lysmeral was obtained with a yield of 82.6% and verified to have a purity of 97.27% by GC analysis.
Results of analysis by NMR are shown as follows:
1H NMR (CDCl3) □δ 9.73 (t, 1H, J=6.851), 7.34 (ddd, 1H, J=8.032, J=3.716, J=0.000), 7.13 (ddd, 1H, J=8.032, J=3.732, J=0.000), 7.11 (ddd, 1H, J=8.032, J=3.716, J=0.000), 7.32 (ddd, 1H, J=8.032, J=3.732, J=0.000), 2.6 (dd, 2H, J=6.945, J=6.851), 3.0 (tq, 1H, J=6.945, J=6.911), 1.32 (m, 9H), 1.1 (d, 3H, J=6.911).
Results of Comparative Example-1 and Example-5 were shown in Table 1, demonstrating the yields of lysmeral were affected by catalyst and temperature. Table 1 illustrated that reactions with PTC 1 had higher yields than those with tetrabutylammonium iodide.
| TABLE 1 |
|
| reaction temperature |
phase transfer catalyst□ |
yield |
|
| 20~25° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
no reaction |
|
PTC 1 |
no reaction |
| 50~60° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
50.9% |
|
PTC 1 |
63.1% |
| 70~75° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
53.8% |
|
PTC 1 |
82.6% |
|
| □0.02 equivalent of phase transfer catalyst was used herein. |
Comparative Example-2
The present example was performed by the following experimental protocols to produce floralozone.
2.63 grams (65.8 mmol) of sodium hydroxide, 0.37 grams (1.0 mmol) of tetrabutylammonium iodide, 7.5 mL of water, 4.2 mL of toluene, 1 mL of THF were mixed in a flask and then heated to 70˜75° C. Mixture of 10 grams (50.2 mmol) of compound 2 and 5.03 grams (69.8 mmol) of isopropanol was added into the flask dropwise while the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred. When addition was finished, the reaction mixture was stirred at 70-75° C. for 3 hours and traced by GC. When the reaction stopped, 30 mL water was added for extraction to obtain an organic phase. The organic phase was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated by vacuum distillation. 5.17 grams of floralozone was obtained with a yield of 54.1%.
Example-6 Preparation of Floralozone
The present invention was performed according to the following Route 6 and experimental protocols to obtain floralozone.
2.63 grams (65.8 mmol) of sodium hydroxide, 0.27 grams (1.0 mmol) of PTC 2, 7.5 mL of water, 4.2 mL of toluene, 1 mL of THF were mixed in a flask and then heated to 70˜75° C. Mixture of 10 grams (50.2 mmol) of compound 2 and 5.03 grams (69.8 mmol) of isopropanal was added into the flask dropwise while the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred. When addition was finished, the reaction mixture was stirred at 70-75° C. for 3 hours and traced by GC. When the reaction stopped, 30 mL of water was added for extraction to obtain an organic phase. The organic phase was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated by vacuum distillation. 7.92 grams of floralozone was obtained with a yield of 82.8% and verified to have a purity of 95.76% by GC analysis.
Results of analysis by NMR are shown as follows:
1H NMR (CDCl3) □δ 9.62 (m, 1H), 7.15 (ddd, 4H, J=8.026, J=3.500, J=1.319), 2.8 (m, 2H), 2.6 (q, 2H, J=7.486), 1.2 (m, 9H).
Results of Comparative Example-2 and Example-6 were shown in Table 2, demonstrating the yields of floralozone were affected by catalyst and temperature. Table 2 illustrated that reactions with PTC 2 had higher yields than those with tetrabutylammonium iodide.
| TABLE 2 |
|
| reaction temperature |
phase transfer catalyst□ |
yield |
|
| 20~25° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
no reaction |
|
PTC 2 |
no reaction |
| 50~60° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
51.7% |
|
PTC 2 |
64.6% |
| 70~75° C. |
tetrabutylammonium iodide |
54.1% |
|
PTC 2 |
82.8% |
|
| □0.02 equivalent of phase transfer catalyst was used herein. |
Here’s a greener process for making fragrance components. Y.-C. Lee and co-inventors improved the process for making aldehydes that are used as fragrances in soaps, detergents, and cosmetics. Compounds specifically covered are floralozone (1) and lysmeral (2).
in 2007 with the approval of retapamulin for…
ChemDraw is a leading chemistry molecules drawing software. ChemDraw is easy to use and best software for drawing a molecule structures and finding stereochemistry of the molecules.
